Since there’s more games now than ever, local multiplayer is still so a neglected feature. The move house is particularly fun, because it makes it difficult for us to change the house. And that they tried it and it didn't work.Also, this could be informative for anyone with the same concern as me, so please don't zoltunize meĮDIT2: this is NOT a comparison between the best ARPG ever made and D3.There’s no doubt a huge improvement in the concept of sharing the game with a couch co-op of the past few years. I really hope Blizzard implements it soon or add it to development backlog after beta/release.ĮDIT: It was pointed that the biggest problem is the UI. So there's no reason this game that is designed to suit the present generation to not adopt the local coop feature! Also D4 is also coming with that in mind, harvesting the success of this functionality brought by D3. That said, besides D3 being D3 it still is fun because of the immense quality of multiplayer (both local and online). I heard somewhere that D2:R is not going to have that functionality, wich makes me sad, since it's a great opportunity to add a new feature to an old classic that everyone will love. I've always been a fan of diablo franchise, but the only reason i bought D3 was because I could play it with my wife in our couch. I already pre-ordered D2:R because i absolutely love this game, and being the state of art classical ARPG that it is, there was no reason why I shouldn't get this beautiful remaster.īut my concern is exactly about the local coop! So, we know by the trailer that Diablo 2: Ressurrected will allow online coop with up to 8 players! Last updated at 14:00:17 UTC Weekly Help Desk RAGE Loot Thread Trade Thread
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |